Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 05:02
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump administration prepares to ease big bank rules - Politico
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
NASA Is Planning to Build a Massive Telescope on the Moon’s Dark Side - The Daily Galaxy
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Simulations find ghostly whirls of dark matter trailing galaxy arms - Ars Technica
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What can you do if you are a full-grown adult, but never experienced being a child?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What's the most incredible coincidence that ever happened to you?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Is it ok to be spanked by your parents if you are not in bed in your set bedtime?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.